Science

I just noticed Mr Beast opted for a scientifically inaccurate clip.

Polar bears live in the Arctic

Working on building zkTLS infra/products. A ruthless empiricist and meme connoisseur.

/opacity

and

/eulerlagrange

Find me evidence of Polar Bear activity in Antarctica in the last 10k years

“scientifically incorrect” is something that undermines the scientific process not

you meant “factually incorrect”

Au Contraire

ProfessorLagrange mode engaged.

You are correct in that it is factually incorrect. What you’re forgetting to consider is the question: How do we know if something is factually incorrect? 🤔

Step 1: Look at Antarctica. 

Step 2: Count polar bears. 

Step 3: Zero. Conclusion: Factually and scientifically confirmed.

I started this channel in channel-genisis squad, for context 😉

You’re missing my point.

I’m saying for this type of knowledge Factually incorrect IMPLIES Scientifically incorrect. 

Factually incorrect implies there is a way to determine that we can all agree on. So what is that method?

There is only another option in the case something is a-priori true like math.

science is not fact or truth
it’s the process through which we question things