Farcaster

I like the idea generally and will have to consider it, but for a couple of things

- I'm not totally sold on the leaderboard algo as it currently is and don't really want to subsidize that - many of the people at the top of the leaderboard I don't know of and/or interact with

- I don't want my money to support builders who actively look down on my people (replyguys)

- It'd be nice to be able to have more say in where your subscription fees specifically go (see above - I'd like to prioritize my money going towards replyguys more than "builders")

If we were able to be a bit more intentional with where our specific subscription fees go (instead of a general fund) I'd be more excited for the idea, I don't think it's bad on its face

We need less vaporware, not more, and I'm scared of incentivizing these people to build more useless stuff

Focus on real products, not empty promises. Incentivizing vaporware only leads to more waste