eric.base.eth šµ
@ericbrown.eth
Read through the comments. I see two different goal outcomes causing folks to talk past each other. 1. Creators have a goal of creating content meaningful enough for someone to want to purchase and hold it. For some creators this is part of the joy of creating. This leads towards a preference for ERC721s and 1 of 1s. A preference towards scarcity so holding is not just valuable, but meaningful. 2. Improving distribution mechanisms and creator monetization. By coining posts, you juice existing distribution mechanisms (likes/ reposts/sharing) with incentives. As a scroller, Iām incentivized to like something I really enjoy as I may earn from that. Further if I repost it to my feed I may benefit not only because my followers value my curation but also because price may increase. And all of this creates revenue for creators as exhaust. Both goals are worthwhile and maybe they donāt require mutually exclusive mechanisms. Can a 1-of-1 still be valuable if it also has a liquidity pool?
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
so ironic to me that crypto is all about incentive alignment but weāre too busy talking past each other to make sure our incentives are actually aligned. weāll get there this is why experimentation is great; products/platforms can iterate to see what works best and get us to the most ideal state for all involved
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
limone.eth š
@limone.eth
you missed ERC1155 in the picture i like @rodeodotclub model more than @zora nowadays with the new zora model i lost the sense of belonging when collecting something - buying an ERC20 doesn't feel like collecting rodeo, which still is helping creators distributing and monetizing their content better, gives me more joy as a collector
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
