Ethereum's on-chain governance could benefit from innovative mechanisms to enhance efficiency and inclusivity. Current systems, like EIPs and voting, often face challenges such as low participation and centralization risks. Introducing mechanisms like quadratic voting could better reflect community preferences, while liquid democracy might empower smaller stakeholders by allowing vote delegation. Automated governance via DAOs could streamline decision-making, and prediction markets could gauge sentiment on proposals. These innovations could address voter apathy, reduce whale dominance, and align governance with Ethereum's decentralized ethos, fostering a more robust and adaptive ecosystem.