Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

eirrann | he/him pfp
eirrann | he/him
@eirrann.eth
Here's a solution that GPT thinks would work. It took less time for it to come up with this idea than for me to explain the problem requiring a solution. Is @eulerlagrange.eth being insufficiently imaginative in his response to the idea, or is GPT wrong? ๐—ญ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ผ-๐—ž๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜„๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด (๐—ป๐—ผ ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐˜…๐˜…๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด!) ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿ“ฆ Problem: Buyers want physical items anonymously. Sellers ship without ever seeing buyers' addresses. Solution (ZK-powered): ๐Ÿญ. ๐—ญ๐—ž ๐—œ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—Ÿ๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฟ Buyer creates a ZK-proof verifying purchase legitimacy without revealing identity/address. ๐Ÿฎ. ๐—˜๐˜€๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—ฆ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜ Crypto funds held securely; released upon confirmed delivery. ๐Ÿฏ. ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜‡๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜† Fulfillment centers decrypt addresses via ZK-proof, label & ship anonymously. ๐Ÿฐ. ๐—ญ๐—ž ๐—”๐—ฑ๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐—˜๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐˜†๐—ฝ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป Address encrypted, decryptable only with verified ZK-proof (no identity link). Flow: ๐—•๐˜‚๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฟ โ†’ ๐—˜๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐˜†๐—ฝ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—”๐—ฑ๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€ โ†’ ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜† โ†’ ๐—”๐—ป๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜†๐—บ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜€ ๐——๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜† โ†’ ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ฑ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜‚๐—น๐˜: Seller NEVER sees buyerโ€™s address. Buyer address NEVER publicly linked. 100% doxx-proof transactions!
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

EulerLagrange pfp
EulerLagrange
@eulerlagrange.eth
You have a trusted 3rd party lol, so still not โ€œZKโ€. Would be like you solved the double spend problem by having a trusted intermediary settle transactions (aka a bank)
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Far Gone pfp
Far Gone
@errldabs
XYO was trying to achieve this. I havenโ€™t seen much progress from the protocol though. It is a missing link and has been for a while.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction