Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
What’s on your mind re: Farcaster? Will try to answer as many questions as I can today.
56 replies
41 recasts
291 reactions
bradq
@bradq
Another year gone, where do you fall on the scale of optimism for FC being a long term 'success' however you define that? Let's go 1-100 scale if you need a way to express. (Hope you and your young family had a great Christmas)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Optimism is 100 otherwise wouldn’t be working on it. It’s different than the original plan (decentralized Twitter as protocol) and headed in the direction of something new (a cryptonative social network and protocol )
3 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
In the importance of identity and social links upgraded in this direction? Will FIP-2 get more love? I'd love to hear more about it.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
FIP-2 is a neat idea, minimal demand so hard to prioritize.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
I don't think you guys have given it enough love. It's a great way for FC to extend beyond the timeline (but the timeline had been the main focus until now, thus the question).
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
> I don't think you guys have given it enough love. What would you do differently?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
It's not like I have a great idea that I keep to myself :-) I just feel it's something that, ok, it's there, but we tend to forget about it. But, take frames v2 for example. My impression is no one asked, what would happen if parent_url pointed to a frame. Or how it could be used. Or how the SDK should behave in this case. I may be wrong and it was internally discussed, was it?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
