Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
It’s a good “marketing” response, but: What % of raycast queries are shortcuts, quick keys, clipboard history? What % of future customers care about these additional features? What happens when computer use is good enough in macOS or from a frontier lab like OpenAI? They’ve raised a bunch of VC money. The only thing that matters now is growth. See also Browser Company. https://x.com/thomaspaulmann/status/1932158501750796724
10 replies
19 recasts
128 reactions
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
100% of raycast users care :)
1 reply
2 recasts
3 reactions
frederick
@sgniwder
while i use raycast, I’d venture 90% of Mac users don’t care about more than 3 items on this list
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
Done.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Koolkheart
@koolkheart.eth
Power features are great for early traction, but long-term success depends on how much value regular users get without tweaking settings or learning hotkeys
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
soosh
@sushen
im a loyal-ish use of Raycast but i will be honest, i don't use 99% of the features listed here. The sole reason i use it for basic things that the current Spotlight sucks at. If that is fixed as shown on the MacOS update today during WWDC, i would likely drop Raycast. Often times, native apps just have a significantly better UX.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jason
@jachian
Late adopter like me doesn’t care. I’ll probably eventually use the Apple defatt
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ProtonXBT
@manshchaudhary
So sad you guys are only thinking about the first 10k pro users @dwr.eth This is what decentralized looks like wow
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Amit Raj.base.eth🎩🔵
@zoroamit.eth
There is nothing left for without pro subscription
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
PixelSushiRobot 💫
@psr
I launch apps and shortcuts. Maybe some niche feature like speed test if I ever remember I had them installed 😅
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Babtun3 (Ø,G)
@babtun3
100%
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction