Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
If having global state on a single server is important, you get to choose two: 1. Long term storage 2. Censorship resistant 3. Cheap
28 replies
10 recasts
269 reactions
ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
1 and 2. i'm willing to pay $$$$$ to sore my old ish.
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Brad Wilde pfp
Brad Wilde
@bwilde
1 and 2; pay to play.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jon "JonnyRingo" Williams pfp
Jon "JonnyRingo" Williams
@jonnyringo.eth
I think Arweave could serve all 3 tho. "Cheap" might be subjective to the user however.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jd 🌺 pfp
jd 🌺
@jdl
does the architecture allow for 3rd parties to underwrite one's casts? could some babes spin up a coin to finance keeping your bangers alive in perpetuity
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Trent pfp
Trent
@trent
allow users to turn on a setting "download all my data every 6 months"
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Trish🫧 pfp
Trish🫧
@trish
A lot to think about. I understand the expense and I’m not putting that on FC. Maybe I’m wrong but your cast suggests to me that you are part of the 85-95 who don’t care as much? What do you think about biographers / historians not being able to access information in 50 years?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dwayne 'The Jock' Ronson pfp
Dwayne 'The Jock' Ronson
@dwayne
You start paying after you hit 10k casts?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Zach Harris pfp
Zach Harris
@zachharris.eth
@dwr.eth why global state on single server? Doesn't IPFS have BOTH distributed CDN and Cold Storage? Why not Option #4 – All of the above
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
vern pfp
vern
@vern
What’s the long term scaling plan though? Even if you cap / charge for storage, there’s no way you’re gossiping reactions for 10mm users over a network of 300 nodes. At a certain point you sacrifice all 3
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
adrienne pfp
adrienne
@adrienne
I'm convinced. 🫡 And I'm someone who very much used twitter as a long term database/catalog. But censorship resistant is too important to compromise. And when I decide to pay more for storage I just want it to be easy to do so, whether through warpcast, or an app like @farchiver or similar
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩 pfp
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
Prefer to pay for storage than get a “free” app with ads. Even with twitter blue (yeah I’m not calling it that other thing) there are still ads & now a whole new upgrade to unlock stuff. Also @farchiver is a great option for keeping everything if you want.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Garrett pfp
Garrett
@garrett
What are your thoughts on Filecoin?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tayyab - d/acc pfp
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
I’ll take 2-3. Lot of perma storage options in crypto the cost.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
llamafacts pfp
llamafacts
@llamafacts.eth
2,3
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
William Mougayar pfp
William Mougayar
@wmougayar
1,2 & 3 rightly priced. I want everything, cake & cherries included. Continue à la carte tradition.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
MJC pfp
MJC
@mjc716
is sharding on the pre-2030 roadmap
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
vrypan |--o--| pfp
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
I've been a strong advocate of long term storage and we had a number of debates on this, but I've flipped. The benefits of 2+3 are huge, and we can try addressing longterm storage outside the protocol.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sam (crazy candle person) ✦ pfp
Sam (crazy candle person) ✦
@samantha
2 and 3. People can build their own indexers to save their casts if they want. I don’t think what anyone is saying is THAT important right now and will change the world. Ready to be proven wrong 😊
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
The Wizard pfp
The Wizard
@queue
Easy choice for 1 & 2, no?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction