Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/no-channel
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
You should really use another client. You’re never going to win this argument.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Consumers in 2024 don’t use chronological feeds. It’s niche.
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Chat UX != feed UX, lol Twitter is chrono is legacy. All effort the last 5 years is algo. It switches you back to algo because that's better for all metrics. The dominant social networks like Instagram, TikTok, YouTube are all algo. That's consumer revealed preference.
6 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
All of the above algos prioritize new content from people you don't follow a lot more than it seems here though Here I don't miss a post from maybe the top 10 people I engage in, but its often 1-2d later, I rarely find someone/something new in my feed though It's almost always in a channel but that experience is suffering from having a true/false curation method making even quality posts there obselete after just hours until it gets that 1d later engagement stimmy injection
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Have you run the 50/50 split test on what feed algo gets more engagement vs. not? :)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
Nope just sharing that my experience echo's the stated issues Its' a qualitative problem no? Numbers lie, people too :)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
