Gauging the Farcaster audience... are women choosing to objectify themselves, or are they being objectified, and some people can’t handle when hot women are good at things?

Most (if not all) of the women you’re all vaguely alluding to aren’t posting thirst traps. They’re not being provocative.
They’re smart. Funny. Consistent. Creative.
And they're also hot, and that triggers your internalized (kind of) misogyny.

Is there pretty privilege at play? Of course. I know all about pretty privilege, I mean look at me. 

But if you’re going to claim the leaderboard is full of people who got there by objectifying themselves, name names. 

Yes, there are gooners and simps here. Always will be.
That’s not why there are women on the leaderboard.

Some of y’all aren’t upset about the content. You’re upset that you like it, and you haven’t figured out how to metabolize that without blaming women.

That’s not critical thinking. It’s just misogyny. And it’s tired.

Do better. Look within. Log off. Touch some grass.
Maybe pet a dog while you’re out there. We’re great at perspective.

I have been an online "creator" since 2001 and this bullshit has been happening that entire time. Back in the day people, including myself honestly, would get jealous because "cam girls" (who were literally women who would update their webcam once every 30 seconds while they were online) would get more traffic than people who ran early blog sites. 
Women are fucking abused constantly for just existing on the internet and this place should be better than that. If you are upset that women  who occasionally post selfies are making a few dollars in weekly rewards you are in the wrong place. Go back to Twitter.
You might think the guy who posts half naked women on here wouldn't be the one who is yelling about online sexism but when you spend all your time hanging out with rad ladies who also happen post sexy photos of themselves you see first hand how terrible you cretins are. 
End of rant.