Dotnet Developer pfp

Dotnet Developer

@dotnetdeveloper

12 Following
3 Followers
Dotnet Developer pfp
Dotnet Developer
@dotnetdeveloper
3, it's cleaner, more readable and technically more standard in many cases.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dotnet Developer pfp
Dotnet Developer
@dotnetdeveloper
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dotnet Developer pfp
Dotnet Developer
@dotnetdeveloper
https://youtu.be/6NMRKAVOosI
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dotnet Developer pfp
Dotnet Developer
@dotnetdeveloper
Sorry, I was trying to comment on @dwr.eth 's post. I guess I clicked cast instead of reply lol. Again...a few day newfarbie
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dotnet Developer pfp
Dotnet Developer
@dotnetdeveloper
Still new and learning, but this is what it seems to be about, this question? If you want to embed utility in the flow of making or reacting to casts, then: Composer Action: Get people to use your tool when creating casts. Cast Action: Get people to use your tool when reacting to a post. Use Frames when you want a rich, interactive experience inside a cast (polls, forms, games). Use Composer Actions when you want to be part of the post-creation experience. Use Cast Actions when you want to add value to an existing post (quick links, reactions, payments, etc.). Is my understanding correct?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dotnet Developer pfp
Dotnet Developer
@dotnetdeveloper
As a new user, but someone in the progress of making some frame apps. Curious if my plan is still ideal, where I plan on putting a prototype up first, no wallet tie in, mainly to gauge user feedback and interest before tying in wallets and having a UI that users don't like. I guess my thought process is to get user feedback early while also ensuring a good engagement?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dotnet Developer pfp
Dotnet Developer
@dotnetdeveloper
@jerbearg.eth Embed tool still constantly doesn't work, but thanks to AI and working through things, then being told I could cast it and try it, it works. Can do actual coding now. Can't believe I wasted so much time when it's the embed test tool lol. https://dirty-santa.vercel.app/api/frame
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dotnet Developer pfp
Dotnet Developer
@dotnetdeveloper
Yes!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dotnet Developer pfp
Dotnet Developer
@dotnetdeveloper
I'd second this. My son has been telling me to "Get on this" but he neither could send an invite code nor could I just pay. Finally got on yesterday. Also, the monad starter template on github seems to not be a simple "clone, follow instructions, test" for anyone wanting to look at how to build and test mini apps. I had to make modifications to get it to build and run, and while I am not familiar with frames and node as much as other frameworks, etc, I am not technically challenged and often try things out I am not familiar with.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Dotnet Developer pfp
Dotnet Developer
@dotnetdeveloper
Anyway, hopefully I will be able to move forward with developing some ideas my son has for mini apps and contribute once I figure out one last item of being able to run the sample app in the embed tool. Doesn't display, and since it was late last night when I finally got on so I could login to the embed tool, I am guessing there is something missing in the template code, which hopefully I will figure out this weekend, or just get a blank project going sooner.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions