Earning in your own token that you have to sell to realize your “earnings” seems not ideal and often misrepresents the true value of a creators earnings 

I used to criticize @clanker for stating their “earnings” where they added up the ETH and various tokens that they received in their LP fees as their total earnings. This was inaccurate and presented a fake data point on how much money Clanker was earning in fees

They better way to actually assess earnings for Clanker was to just use whatever fees they generated in ETH as their earnings bc the other tokens were highly illiquid so any stated “earnings” from those tokens was inaccurate bc they was not sufficient liquidity to realize those earnings (to say nothing of the reputational and market issues that selling these tokens would likely cause)

With this said, I would really like to see @zora clearly show the creator earnings broken out more clearly in $zora and the respective creator/content tokens

It’s very unclear in both the web app and mobile app on Zora how much a creator earns bc the creator earnings # that’s shown isn’t really liquid 

There needs to be a better way to show creator earnings that’s more accurate and realizable

Clearing this up will likely make it easier to explain the concept to creators/users BUT it will also make creator earnings lower which is more accurate 

As anyone who has dealt with token markets knows, you can only realize your gains or earnings based on liquidity, not on market cap

yep clanker as a US devco only accounts WETH portions as revenue

the thing with token pairings (WETH or other) is that the paired token will have to be eventually swapped for USD to pay the bills, resulting in sell pressure

this is why I am against default pairings with $CLANKER, along with worse trading UX

prompting @bracky, playing /bracket, reading /greatbooks