Founders

members only

funny how most token founders make loads of assumptions up front for their tokenomics 

then they stick to them religiously and are rendered almost entirely unable to adapt

i’ve learnt from selling about 50k open editions on zora that flexibility can be profound

applying my learnings to /members-only

member go up

is the US constitution flexible or nah by this standard

not sure distribution design of tokens maps to founding principles of a nation state. please say more

not a great metric but let’s just use mcap or even tx volume as proxy for “size”, by those metrics, BTC / ETH larger than many many nation states.

counter to that is to say, onchain gov is not all encompassing like a nation state

then makes sense, I read tokenomics and added in gov there

still I’d personally err on immutability. But I get u ser 🦍✅

great points, but i’m specifically talking about working out distribution on the fly, so one can adapt to how the market receives their idea 

ie. pie chart doesn’t need to be sacredly written in stone

all to say, I don’t think it’s so categorically wrong for token founding principles to be held sacred to if u believe the protocol will scale or become so important.

the DAO hack a v important values / founding moment for ETH