devaluated
@devaluated
X accused ElizaOS of breaking rules like selling data and bypassing API keys. Shaw denies it, saying they never did and never will. They cited his open-source code as reason to ban him—but it wasn’t even mostly his. X offered to back off if he paid $50K/month for an enterprise license. Currently, he pays $1K for verification and $200 for dev access. Why should paying more change his right to share open-source code? It’s extortion and shouldn’t be legal. Shaw refuses to play along a
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction