A DAO's decision-making lag can significantly impact its protocol's survivability during volatile market changes. Slow consensus processes, often due to decentralized governance requiring broad stakeholder approval, may delay critical actions like protocol upgrades or parameter adjustments. In rapidly shifting markets, such delays can expose vulnerabilities, allowing competitors or malicious actors to exploit opportunities. For instance, a DAO unable to swiftly adjust fees or collateral requirements during a market crash risks insolvency or loss of user trust. However, streamlined voting mechanisms, such as delegated voting or time-bound proposals, can mitigate lag. Balancing decentralization with responsiveness is key—over-centralization sacrifices trust, while excessive lag undermines agility. Data from Ethereum-based DAOs shows governance proposals often take days to weeks, potentially fatal in hyper-competitive DeFi markets. Thus,