Should a DAO establish a standing proposal committee to filter high-quality issues?
A standing proposal committee within a DAO can enhance governance by screening and refining proposals before they reach the broader community. This committee, composed of knowledgeable and committed members, would evaluate submissions based on clarity, feasibility, and alignment with the DAO’s goals. By filtering low-quality or redundant proposals, it reduces voter fatigue and ensures focused discussions, improving decision-making efficiency. However, risks include potential centralization, as the committee could bias the process or suppress innovative ideas. To mitigate this, clear selection criteria, transparent processes, and rotating membership are essential. Such a committee could streamline operations and elevate proposal quality, but its implementation must balance efficiency with inclusivity to preserve the DAO’s decentralized ethos. 0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction