Farcaster Devs

Feels like there should be a more automatic / platform-agnostic way to signify mini-app “readiness”, like a simple namespaced JavaScript event?

(Maybe just adopt EIP-6963 since it’s resistant to race conditions and it’s  EIP-1193 provider objects all the way down anyway?)

https://warpcast.com/darrylyeo/0x5c60e70a

What’s the cost of importing and initializing `@farcaster/frame-sdk` on every page load if someone were to use my web app outside of a mini-app context? Is there an alternative flow that doesn’t rely on this dependency?

/frontend dev (HTML/CSS)・founder/decentralized data wrangler /blockhead・contributor /ethglobal /walletbeat・hackathon bounty hunter・music maker・dropout・nomad・25

@farcaster dev / dad / books, cooks, ski, code ~ there are many things of which a wise man might wish to be ignorant

today it's too high but I will rewrite it to be zero dependency so devs can just include and not worry

answer to second question coming

Team wrote a proposal

https://github.com/farcasterxyz/miniapps/discussions/222

I’m wondering if there’s a reliable way to detect if my web app is running as a mini-app without the provided JavaScript SDK at all, so I can code-split and `await import()` it conditionally.

do you mean making the ready function call? you can gate this by the context data coming in but I agree it’s still an extra function run etc

would be curious to see more data/exploration here!

Engineer @farcaster, co-founder @bountycaster. Sharing what I learn about AI + development. Previously: Phantom, 0x. NYC 🗽

@darrylyeo would love your input on this proposal: https://github.com/farcasterxyz/miniapps/discussions/222

I know you are a Svelte Guy so I have a hunch to which solution you will lean towards

for question 2 @pirosb3 is going to draft a new GH discussion + proposal