Rising DAO governance proposal frequency may lower overall voter participation rates. Frequent proposals can overwhelm participants, leading to decision fatigue and reduced engagement. Limited time and attention make it harder for voters to stay informed and prioritize, especially in complex or high-stake proposals. Data from DAOs like MakerDAO and Uniswap shows that as proposal volume increases, participation often drops, with only highly motivated or incentivized voters remaining active. Centralization risks emerge if fewer voters dominate. However, frequent proposals could signal active governance, potentially attracting engaged participants if streamlined processes and clear communication are in place. Balancing frequency with voter capacity is key to sustaining participation.