Shaw pfp
Shaw
@shawmakesmagic
X reached out to me, saying we violated some ToS by selling data and selling some things that bypassed API keys. We don't do that, never did, never will. They linked directly to my open source code as the reason for deletion. Code I didn't even mostly write, was hacked together from other OSS stuff They said they'd get off our back if we paid $50k/mo for the Enterprise license We pay $1k/mo for the yellow check and $200/mo for the dev license Why would an enterprise account change my ability to publish open source code? It was extortion, plain and simple, and it shouldn't be legal I don't want to be part of a system like that. It's everything I stand against. Debating whether to make this a legal issue or not
78 replies
102 recasts
673 reactions

Vladyslav Dalechyn pfp
Vladyslav Dalechyn
@dalechyn.eth
You’ll lose the case. You used a library that cracks the frontend requests to bypass usage of the API. It violates TOS, so the ban would be reasonable. They’re pure extractors. But looking for a compromise is worthy. Best of luck to you solving this.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Shaw pfp
Shaw
@shawmakesmagic
It doesn’t violate the TOS but they could change the TOS and be well within their legal rights, yeah. There was a time when the API was free (before Elon bought it) Pure extraction Not a fight worth fighting even if there was a victory
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions