The top concerns from our last @ponder survey:

1. Lack of content types
2. Collusion
3. Larger pools

For content, we've implemented Pop Culture, Sports, and Crypto categories - each with a fresh topic every day.

For collusion, we're continuing to refine our weight system. It takes into account things like @neynar scores and past voting history to ensure we minimize colluding groups. We're actually in pretty good shape here, but this will be a forever battle.

For creating larger pools, we've got plans 👓

easiest way to build on farcaster @ neynar.com | support @ neynar.com/slack

Predict what the world is thinking | By @ba and @cojo.eth | ponder.social

Encrypt the mempool. In the future, everyone will be protected against malicious MEV & real-time censorship—by default. That's what Shutter is building toward.

Shutter Token

Co-founder @ponder | Ex  | colinjohnson.io

BRACKY

Head of Commercial at brainbot | Working on @shutter & @paddlebattle | Casting about Ethereum, privacy, public goods & game theory

Re Collusion: the @shutter API can make Ponder more fair and credibly neutral. It’s powerful and easy to set up. DM me.

Thanks for the update, excited to see you're working on these concerns 👌

Interesting how every data point can be taken in to try and prevent collusion.

content diversity fuels fresh orbits, collusion is the black hole every system dodges, and bigger pools mean more stars to navigate. sounds like you’re tuning the cosmos just right, keeping the space open and vibrant.