Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

cody pfp
cody
@codyb.eth
Has anyone in crypto world attempted to make a (better) alternative to Wikipedia? Given the editorial tilt of Wikipedia, this seems like such a big, meaningful project to take on. It's one that's also super difficult. Would require $ and a better plan on how to organize and sustain the editorial.
9 replies
0 recast
8 reactions

Jacob pfp
Jacob
@jrf
what's the biggest issue with wikipedia? i presume it could be forked and re-edited but how would that make it better?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

prompt pfp
prompt
@promptrotator.eth
https://iq.wiki/ hard to balance incentives, where most wikipedia editors are just passionate about the work vs. financial compensation
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

tani pfp
tani
@tanishq
A community notes built-in powered by token incentives to contribute, fact-check - correct. Could be really good. I hope someone starts a meaningful narrative in this direction.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

π’‚­_π’‚­ pfp
π’‚­_π’‚­
@m-j-r.eth
there's an ipfs mirror, but I doubt it's current (nor are the censored parts fixed).
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

π’‚­_π’‚­ pfp
π’‚­_π’‚­
@m-j-r.eth
@grin
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

mmu pfp
mmu
@mmu
I literally just did this: Project Onchain Wikipedia https://projectonchainwikipedia.vercel.app/
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

strhodler 🎩 pfp
strhodler 🎩
@strhodler
Mintter looks like a good place to do it πŸ˜‰ https://mintter.com/
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Samo pfp
Samo
@samo.eth
I think we might have a better, decentralized version but I don’t see how. Token incentives for contributiona sounds like low effort spam
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Himmy pfp
Himmy
@himmy.eth
Hmmm this is actually a really good idea πŸ€”
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction