Need a secondary agent to just always be asking "is this a good idea"? to everything my primary agent is planning on doing

not that different than all the voices in my head

good read to counter the concept of mult-agent architecture/thinking; instead, the same agent should simply be given the "is this a good idea?" prompt as a subtask

Decentralized open source consciousness | Values-aligned communities | citizen of Black Rock City

good read to counter the concept of mult-agent architecture/thinking; instead, the same agent should simply be given the "is this a good idea?" prompt as a subtask https://cognition.ai/blog/dont-build-multi-agents

Head of Product at @syky /digital-fashion. Love all dogs and especially my own. ex-Ledger

ah yes. well, many ways to architect. i appreciate them sharing their learnings so other teams don't waste time making similar mistakes

I’ve been thinking (but not yet experimenting) in the other direction:

https://chatgpt.com/share/685b083f-3fa8-8012-9b10-30b3457fadc2

i think you're right! my response was mainly driven by my own experience of:
1. learning how these systems are built
2. starting to think about possibilities and imagining "complex/more sophisticated" architectures with multiple agents 
3. reading the above and having the realization, "ah! multi-agent != better in a lot of instances and here's why"

A lot of other thoughts here.

1. the way they break the subtasks down matters a lot. Ideally, they don't need the context of the other ones, similar to when you break work out for multiple people

2. The context compression LLM *is another agent*...

3. The original ages will be biased that it is a good idea because it's their idea. A separate agent (potentially with a different random seed) has a higher chance of having a differing opinion