@chriscocreated

Loved the 𝘖𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘰𝘱𝘩𝘢 call yesterday looking at how we make Sopha a great place for artists and writers. Here are the notes. Great to meet @eirrann.eth loved @naaate insight about uncozy corners. 𝗦𝗨𝗠𝗠𝗔𝗥𝗬 The meeting centered on a deep discussion about the nature of online communities for creators, specifically within the context of the 𝗦𝗼𝗽𝗵𝗮 platform on Farcaster. The conversation flowed from personal stories of artistic rediscovery and the failures of mainstream social media to the foundational principles needed to build a durable, meaningful space for artists and writers. Key themes included the search for depth over ephemeral engagement, the critical need for safety and anonymity, and the ongoing tension between creating intimate "cozy corners" and achieving sustainable distribution. 𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗧𝗜𝗖𝗜𝗣𝗔𝗡𝗧 𝗠𝗢𝗧𝗜𝗩𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡𝗦 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗕𝗔𝗖𝗞𝗚𝗥𝗢𝗨𝗡𝗗𝗦 A diverse group of creators shared their journeys to the platform, united by a desire for a more substantive online environment. • One participant, after a two-decade hiatus enforced by military and corporate life, rediscovered a creative outlet through AI art, finding early validation in niche crypto-art communities. • Another described themselves as a "social media refugee," having watched platforms like Instagram and Twitter degrade from powerful distribution channels for their photography and writing into unusable spaces, leading them to seek refuge in Farcaster. • The founder of Sopha framed their motivation as that of a "philosopher builder" or "community artist," aiming to create infrastructure that facilitates genuine connection and creativity for themselves and others, inspired by the unique "scenius" of early Farcaster. • A fourth participant expressed interest in how on-chain tools and AI could enable new forms of collaborative, "multiplayer" creativity, drawing parallels to historical art movements that emerged from tight-knit scenes. 𝗖𝗥𝗜𝗧𝗜𝗤𝗨𝗘 𝗢𝗙 𝗠𝗔𝗜𝗡𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗠 𝗦𝗢𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟 𝗠𝗘𝗗𝗜𝗔 Existing platforms were analyzed and found wanting, primarily due to toxicity, impermanence, and algorithm-driven degradation. • 𝗧𝘄𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 (𝗫) was characterized as increasingly toxic and capricious, with the real risk of being deplatformed and losing one's entire social graph and creative history, a firsthand experience for one participant. • 𝗜𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗺 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗲𝗱𝗜𝗻 were cited as examples of platforms that ruined their utility for creators by shifting algorithms to favor video or brand-safe content, destroying the distribution that artists and writers once relied upon. • The fundamental "job" of social networks was identified as providing users with the feeling of 𝗯𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝗲𝗲𝗻. When platforms fail at this, either through algorithmic obscurity or hostile environments, users become refugees in search of a new home. 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗩𝗜𝗧𝗔𝗟 𝗥𝗢𝗟𝗘 𝗢𝗙 𝗔𝗡𝗢𝗡𝗬𝗠𝗜𝗧𝗬 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗦𝗔𝗙𝗘𝗧𝗬 For many professionals, the ability to create under a pseudonym is not a luxury but a necessity for true artistic freedom. • Compartmentalization between one's professional (IRL) identity and creative persona is essential for those in sensitive fields, such as individuals with security clearances or those who have faced credible professional threats due to public exposure. • Anonymity allows for exploration of taboo subjects, political discourse, and personal artistic themes without fear of real-world repercussions, enabling a form of expression that would otherwise be impossible. • Farcaster's protocol-level design, where one's social graph persists even if a specific client (app) bans them, was highlighted as a superior model for safety and durability compared to centrally controlled platforms. 𝗘𝗡𝗩𝗜𝗦𝗜𝗢𝗡𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗦𝗢𝗣𝗛𝗔'𝗦 𝗣𝗨𝗥𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗘 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗠𝗘𝗧𝗔𝗣𝗛𝗢𝗥 The group explored various conceptual models for what Sopha could become, emphasizing a space for depth and curation. • Core aspirations for Sopha include being a 𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗲𝗽𝗵𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗵𝗼𝗺𝗲 for work and a "𝗰𝗼𝘇𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗻𝗲𝗿" 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘁 where creators feel their work is deeply appreciated, not just scrolled past. • Architectural metaphors were debated: a 𝗰𝗼𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗲 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝗽, 𝗹𝗶𝗯𝗿𝗮𝗿𝘆, 𝗼𝗿 𝗴𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗿𝘆 with central gathering spaces and many side rooms; a 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝘂𝗻𝗲 with private houses and a shared common house; or a 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 with public courtyards, private parlors, and intimate bedrooms for trusted circles. • A key insight was the desire for an "𝘂𝗻𝗰𝗼𝘇𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗻𝗲𝗿"-a space safe enough to allow for uncomfortable, challenging feedback and creative risk-taking, supported by a foundation of trust and mutual understanding that such criticism won't break the relationship. 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗖𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗟 𝗧𝗘𝗡𝗦𝗜𝗢𝗡: 𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗜𝗠𝗔𝗖𝗬 𝗩𝗦. 𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗜𝗕𝗨𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 A significant portion of the debate focused on whether a small, dedicated community is sufficient or if built-in distribution mechanisms are essential. • The "𝗰𝗼𝘇𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗻𝗲𝗿" 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹 promises deep appreciation and connection but may top out at a small number of highly engaged participants, which can be nourishing but doesn't scale or provide monetary sustainability. • The 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗯𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹 recognizes that creators have limited time (a "return on attention" hurdle) and often need broader reach for validation and, potentially, income. • The concept of "𝗺𝘂𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗽𝗹𝗮𝘆𝗲𝗿" 𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗶𝘁𝘆 was proposed as a potential solution: small groups or collectives (a 𝘴𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘶𝘴) working together could create more impactful work that has a better chance of finding an audience, sharing both the creative burden and the potential rewards. 𝗕𝗨𝗜𝗟𝗗𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗗𝗨𝗥𝗔𝗕𝗟𝗘, 𝗢𝗡-𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗜𝗡 𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗥𝗔𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗖𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗘 Technical discussions focused on how to make creative contributions and curation efforts last beyond the lifespan of any single application. • A major limitation of current platforms (evidenced by the shutdown of 𝗥𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗼) is the impermanence of both the platform and the social actions (likes, curation) that happen there. • The ideal vision is for all meaningful actions within Sopha (e.g., curating a cast into a collection) to be recorded 𝗼𝗻-𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗶𝗻, making them persistent, permissionless, and portable. • Upcoming protocol developments like 𝗵𝘆𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗻𝗮𝗽 (an extended frames-like system) were mentioned as a potential path to enable richer, on-chain interactions (e.g., a "curate" reaction) that could form the backbone of a durable creative ecosystem. 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗕𝗘𝗔𝗥𝗜𝗦𝗛 𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗟𝗜𝗧𝗬 𝗢𝗙 𝗪𝗘𝗕𝟯 𝗔𝗥𝗧 𝗣𝗟𝗔𝗧𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗠𝗦 The recent shutdown of Rodeo served as a sobering case study on the challenges facing digital art platforms. • The closure underscored the 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗹 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗻 𝘁𝗲𝗺𝗽𝗼𝗿𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗻𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 of many Web3 projects still searching for product-market fit, despite users often perceiving them as permanent. • Participants mourned the loss of not just a marketplace, but a community space and a body of work (with one having minted over 150 pieces there), highlighting the fragility of digital contexts. • This reinforced the argument for 𝗼𝗻-𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝗱𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 and raised questions about the sustainability of platforms that rely on continuous user engagement without a clear economic model. 𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗔𝗦 𝗙𝗢𝗥 𝗦𝗢𝗣𝗛𝗔'𝗦 𝗘𝗩𝗢𝗟𝗨𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗚𝗥𝗢𝗪𝗧𝗛 The conversation concluded with practical brainstorming for near-term development and community building. • 𝗖𝘂𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝘀 𝗮 𝗟𝗮𝘂𝗻𝗰𝗵𝗽𝗮𝗱: Using 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 curated within Sopha as shareable, high-quality "cultural artifacts" to attract attention from the broader Farcaster ecosystem, effectively "matching the hatch" of current community interests. • 𝗦𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗦𝗼𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗟𝗮𝘆𝗲𝗿𝘀: Implementing a system of 𝗿𝗼𝗹𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗿 𝗴𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀 that would allow creators to share work at different levels of privacy-from public broadcasts to semi-private spaces for trusted feedback, to fully intimate circles for vulnerable works-in-progress. • 𝗙𝗼𝗰𝘂𝘀 𝗼𝗻 𝗖𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗩𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗲: The advice was to 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱 𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗼𝘁𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲, focusing energy on demonstrating the unique value of the community (deep discussion, thoughtful pauses, curated content) rather than solely on feature development, in order to grow organically from the current small, dedicated user base.

3 replies

8 recasts

20 reactions