july

the more i explore spirituality and consciousness, the less i am able to defend against this conclusion.

no kings. only working on impossible things.

For me, this depends on where we draw the boundaries in our definitions of those three players. As the machines we create grow more life-like, human beings seem increasingly machine-like to us.

And what do we consider nature, anyway? Is it even possible to say nature is separate from humans and humans’ creations, if we are natural?

Building a little space by the ocean. More information at /thenextwave coming soon.

yes, I agree. 

and as I delve into spirituality, I'm discovering that those lines aren't just blurred, but that they probably don't exist at all. 

the boundaries only exist because our brains decide they do. 

helpful for sense-making (something our brains are particularly good at), but not necessarily "true". 

...but turning to these types of "everything is all" positions kind of makes it impossible to establish an argument, so...

Exactly. “We are all one”… until we need to allocate finite resources in the material world.