Caygeon.degen.eth ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿ– pfp
Caygeon.degen.eth ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿ–
@caygeon
Can we just not do the L3? Let's go with Base and let it rip...market is too hot to be mired in this and I haven't heard a compelling reason for why we need an L3.
3 replies
2 recasts
10 reactions

Hessamsh.eth ๐Ÿดโ€โ˜ ๏ธ pfp
Hessamsh.eth ๐Ÿดโ€โ˜ ๏ธ
@he
๐Ÿ– x781 This is the reason. Onchain cheap transaction for 0.001 cent. On base it costs 1c
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Wellzy ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿ–โœž pfp
Wellzy ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿ–โœž
@wellzy
Trump said the same exact thing 1528 $degen
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Maning๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Maning๐ŸŽฉ
@maning
You have my vote!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Colton Dillion ๐Ÿƒ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Colton Dillion ๐Ÿƒ๐ŸŽฉ
@cadillion
The way we think of L3s: Optimized, batteries-included dev experiences for devs who want to go fast The key complaints we hear about developing on L2s: - too expensive to throw out a cheap experiment - hard to get attention of the chain for custom precompiles, oracles, and other features - unsuitable for high volume applications like games, ridesharing, microtransactions, etc DEGEN L3 and its associated services on, eg neynar or dune, are the de facto oracles for farcaster data, and soon a cluster for handling namespaces and payment rails across social networks Running these use-cases economically on Base may be possible during the bear market, but we remember the costs when Base volumes were hot We have a lot of work to do to decentralize the L3 nitro and sequencer, but make no mistake that L2 throughputs and costs are still a far cry from competing with Visa, Uber, or Venmo scale
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction