@cassie

Open question of governance in crypto – Generally, there exists three different kinds of actors in the space: protocol nodes, clients and apps, and users. Sometimes people fall into all three categories, but you can see a strong example of the distinction in projects like ethereum, farcaster, and solana. When it comes to governance, approaches like QV or direct token = vote creates problematic dynamics with sybiling, but trying to resolve those creates a separate problem of not having enough skin in the game. Has anyone tried tricameral governance in crypto? e.g. node operators as a "senate", app developers as a "house", and users as a third institution like the other two (with passage of proposals/changes required to be accepted by all three units without further amendment)

101 replies

12 recasts

579 reactions