Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Kath ๐Ÿ‘น๐Ÿ”ธ๐Ÿšฎ pfp
Kath ๐Ÿ‘น๐Ÿ”ธ๐Ÿšฎ
@artichokelord
Genuine question: Do yaโ€™ll think there will come a time that artists/designers wonโ€™t be able to compete with AI? The sheer amount of work produced in one generation from 1 prompt (say 100k pieces) is more than I could produce by hand in my lifetime. Even if it was a purely digital work. (1 of 2)
5 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

ByteBuddha pfp
ByteBuddha
@bytebuddha
Imagine it's the late 90s. You ask Kasparov if there will be a time when humans chess players will no longer compete with computers. What do you think he'd say? I believe trying to compete with AI art is the wrong way to think about it. There would be AI-art and human-art. Some will likely prefer one over the other.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Kath ๐Ÿ‘น๐Ÿ”ธ๐Ÿšฎ pfp
Kath ๐Ÿ‘น๐Ÿ”ธ๐Ÿšฎ
@artichokelord
Can you explain the chess analogy here? Not connecting how itโ€™s related to the topic at hand, I do see the parallels in controversy though!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ByteBuddha pfp
ByteBuddha
@bytebuddha
In the 90s humans used to try to outperform computers at chess, similar to how many in the arts industry are trying to do today. Today, outperforming a computer at chess is futile. Yet people still conduct chess tournaments, because its a human v. human endeavour. Anyone who doesn't find value in that is ngmi.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction