Stables this stables that how about a stable follower count

I just want us to have fun | Cofounder @ Resolve (YC) - spatial tech for construction. FC tinkering: @livecaster @harmonybot /bot-or-not | /orange-dao

good joke. 

i think with incentives (e.g. tipping), the idea for spammers to benefit might be more common than we think, thus affecting follower count

Applied AI, databases, data, vibe coding (sic.), open source, community/devrel, remote. 

itinerant businessperson. globalist.

Kuala Lumpur, Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

I would just like engagement more than a metric

i think you're spot on - active engagement beats follower count by miles. micro influencers are probably way more authentic. and i just read this:

stream of concious writer, musician, & artist | co-founder of /wac

i think you're spot on - active engagement beats follower count by miles. micro influencers are probably way more authentic. and i just read this: https://www.axios.com/2025/06/18/axios-cannes-event-influencers-audience-brand-authenticity

we can get most engagement metrics minus the view counts which is fc only. and yes, such coolness will come.

viral casts - you mean amps likes+recast purchases right

there's definitely something to be said about cozy corners. depth vs breadth etc.

would be cool to visualize one's engagement : follower ratio. I suspect the 100k+ followers don't get orders of magnitude more average engagement than a 5k account. 

perhaps they have a higher likelihood of a viral cast. but now we can pay for those 😅