Network States

I'm getting in the reps daily to craft a vision for the future of government.

I want to find simple, impactful words to share these ideas. 

Today I describe "network state trust graphs" -- a modern approach to legislature.

I'm getting in the reps daily to craft a vision for the future of government.

I want to find simple, impactful words to share these ideas. 

Today I describe "network state trust graphs" -- a modern approach to legislature.
https://mirror.xyz/byldr.eth/fdaGPo1IllQeL7HcO-SKPEX303KmpU6Rjf785kKMHzM

Follow me to read about a vision for a government that won't piss you off.

it's a system with no elections, that maps the lines of trust through a population and gives those trusted people decision making power.

it guards against populism using dunbar's number -- a person can only have 100 people directly delegating to them, but then can transitively a maximum of 20% of the populations voting power

the idea is that if you're delegating to someone, that you actually know them and trust them to make decisions in your best interests

they shouldn't just be some activist leader with a catchy message

the ultimate check on the system is that trust can be revoked in real time. and in times of high controversy, all citizens could choose to be a voice in decision making and there would be temporary direct democracy

but in times of high trust and alignment, the same system could leverage the benefits of the simplicity of 5 highly competent and temporarily empowered people creating policy, budgets, and collective vision.

today I wrote this. It describes the concept of and visualizes a ruleset for a thing I'm calling a civilizational trust graph that could be the future of legislature

Next time I immutably publish an article, I'll proofread it.

It is a good concept, but probably yet with some logic gaps to cover.

For instance, the challenge of making people engage. DAOs have shown this for years. Doesn't matter if you have a good coordination system if people don't participate.

Founder Peerbase.
Producing the docuseries about network states and startup societies https://startupsociety.film.

Well, that’s the idea is to map the lines of trust in the group on day 1 and then there isn’t many people participating, they’ve delegated. And then there’s a small group doing everything, but if that small group ever pisses the group off, they lose “the Mandate of Heaven” in real time

It is a good concept, but probably yet with some logic gaps to cover.

For instance, the challenge of making people engage. DAOs have shown this for years. Doesn't matter if you have a good coordination system if people don't participate.

https://news.peerbase.xyz/p/how-to-achieve-100-engagement-in