it’s hard for me to understand this point of view as a bitcoiner. we already had this battle and the side of the fork that sacrificed network fundamentals (verifiability, decentralization) in order to prioritize the business model of startups was relegated to the dustbin of history (remembered as “Bitcoin Cash”). 

but i think this is a harder question for other chains because they aren’t competing to be the “Phial of Galadriel” and instead need to strike a balance between UX and decentralization for smart contracting. i don’t have the answer but it will likely be different for every chain and speaks to its fundamental nature.

surgeon, technologist, writer, humanist. read.pourteaux.xyz 

i was there for the blocksize wars
btc side was also able to sell the story of BTC the store of value and not the 'payment rail' medium of exchange

you can't simultanously be the world computer and have inaccessible compute
the world won't be able to run its compute on you 
simple as that

the difference between BTC Maxis and Ethereum Foundation Retardation is that the maxis somehow sold their narrative up and pumped the price 

EFR has made the chain useless AND can't sell the narrative 
i'd be happy with one of the two

the difference between BTC Maxis and Ethereum Foundation Retardation is that the maxis somehow sold their narrative up and pumped the price 

EFR has made the chain useless AND can't sell the narrative 
i'd be happy with one of the two
https://warpcast.com/randomerror.eth/0x9ae962e0

Twerking on Farpcaster and Warcast.

(parody)