I don’t see myself getting excited over tokens where the novelty is quote cast growth hacks and meta discussion 

my unpopular opinion is that memecoin prices are easy to influence I.e $10k influx drives $100k value change and it’s also easy to do that on a few unlisted accounts that do/don’t sell off slowly in the background. easy*easy=lots of money, what do you think is happening?

crypto enabled new tech value investing with fractional amounts, but because people are uneducated it makes them easy to manipulate in mass. (get rich quick)

The value of memecoins was sidestepping regulatory risk that no longer exists. It’s a silly narrative otherwise, like content coins.

https://farcaster.xyz/farcasteradmin.eth/0xf6127cd3

https://farcaster.xyz/lambchop/0x6ae51857

As a quick follow-up, what I’m saying doesn’t have anything to do with the token launchers themselves; permissionless launches like this don’t require the creator to be involved in such “farming” techniques. Actually, it makes more sense that they don’t, because it reduces awareness, and blame is almost always oriented at them despite otherwise decent intentions. It enables a constant rotation of new token/project supply. Food for thought but DYOR.

i dabble with ai using open identity data from crypto https://alexpaden.tech

after a while around the patterns seem to emerge innit

CEO and Founder of $BLEU

Developing infinite memetics AI Agent @elefant


lebleuelefant.com

yeah idk, i kinda bought into the idea of true decentralization first, i think the main issue is we don't have a big enough mass for a few to not manipulate markets, just like in regulated markets anyways.

I guess the lesson is crypto or tradfi, doesn't matter, human nature prevails.

story as old as time

pattern was always obvious that's why people talked about cabal despite the term being used so loosely that people joked about it

manipulation/insider trading is as old (n) as trading itself +1