Hate to yuck a lot of the yum going on right now, but I don’t like content coins because they encourage rugging the creator.

Example: someone buys a post of a creator for $5. Later it sells for $100. They make a 20x. The creator gets hardly anything.

That dynamic treats creators like inventory, not people worth supporting.

Promote holding. Reward buyers with rev share. Align incentives around supporting creators, not flipping their work.

Would love to better understand or be proven otherwise.

@quicknode GTM | building /startupradar 📡                                 rants and travel photos are my own

What you’re saying is right, but what you’re asking is for artists to do more work around maintaining content as opposed to create the things that brought them the ability for their content to have value in the first place (the art/work/product/brand/etc)

Aspiring Gundam pilot •
Sharing my thoughts at /blackdave •
Bringing people together at @projectpharos

Every web3 tool for “creators” is only as good as the creators are willing to use them, and many of us will tell you that doing all this community maintenance post by post ain’t worth the squeeze