Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/replyguys
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Bitfloorsghost
@bitfloorsghost.eth
I still am torn on the idea of people getting paid a % of volume in fees when they launch a token via $clanker or other launchpads these days it’s great in that it’s a way for creators to get paid without having to dump tokens which is vastly preferable, there’s no question there but it also can make the people who launch it really not care about how a token does - volume is the most important thing, so whether you’re buying or selling, it doesn’t matter also leads to people launching a bunch of tokens just to farm those fees and then they move onto the next one It’s a big upgrade over just giving creators a bunch of tokens (from a community standpoint, less likely to get dumped on) but doesn’t align incentives as well either since volume is what matters
4 replies
2 recasts
25 reactions
Bitfloorsghost
@bitfloorsghost.eth
just thinking out loud, I wonder if it’d be worth unlocking a % of fees when coins hit certain tiers of market cap even instead of just having it available right off the bat
3 replies
0 recast
10 reactions
tricil
@tricil.eth
clanker v4 can do this: vaults with vesting
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
BrixBountyFarm 🎩
@brixbounty
@dish @lobstermindset.eth Interesting idea aligned incentives has always been my description of properly clanked coins.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
lobs (fka bob)
@lobstermindset.eth
we’re in the process of upgrading our hooks to allow for permissionless ‘pool extensions’ which can be triggered after a swap on a pool someone could build what you described into their coin’s pool extension: send the fees from the coin to the pool extension, only have the extension release the fees if the mcap sustains a certain level for a chunk of time
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
