Content pfp
Content
@
https://www.optimism.io
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

binji pfp
binji
@binji
a timeless @kelvin classic https://kelvinfichter.com/pages/thoughts/hybrid-rollups/
1 reply
1 recast
22 reactions

EulerLagrangodamus pfp
EulerLagrangodamus
@eulerlagrange
I actually have an idea on how to do a hybrid zk/op roll up. It uses the underlying principle of this post I wrote: https://ethresear.ch/t/lookup-singularity-via-mmr/18704 …
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

EulerLagrangodamus pfp
EulerLagrangodamus
@eulerlagrange
Ignore the MMR part. So we’re just precomputing a lookup table and use it as a public input into the circuit. We have a ZKP + a list of assumptions. If the ZKP is incorrect, something in the table must be wrong. Submitting a fraud proof a table entry is a lot simpler than bisecting the execution trace.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

binji pfp
binji
@binji
tagging in people who can speak euler in case interested @tynes @kelvin @proto.eth
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

EulerLagrangodamus pfp
EulerLagrangodamus
@eulerlagrange
Thanks! Ive thought this through. Even the MMR approach with an EigenLayer AVS would be more simple than the current approach. You just tune the amount staked to adjust security level.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction