coins

@base builder #001; onchain cities w/ OAK & city3

the part i have trouble with (until the behavior — or my understanding — scales) is that today I pay attention with my eyes not with my wallet

perhaps one way coins can scale to the masses is to make the “buy” action feel less manual. 

> charge a subscription 
> invest on a coin/post based on the screen time a user spends on it 

this makes investing in coins more passive; and well, if one pops off — then the user profits.

lore @optimism | ex: @coinbase | views are my own | what if it all worked out? 

the more you abstract the act of buying, the more likely a user is to engage across a variety of different coins which could incentivize more creators; that in turn can bring better creators who up the screen time of users (thus more investment).

regarding coins and zora’s current approach. 

what do you think? https://t.co/oBaWz1INgi

binji

also shared here for CT’s opinion 

https://x.com/binji_x/status/1912359680031998379?s=46

A really good example of this abstraction is fountain.fm they make it so when you listen to a podcast a set amount of sats get sent to the creator.

A superfluid eth version of this would go hard and something I’ve been asking for over a year now.