bincryptofond pfp

bincryptofond

@bincrypto

79 Following
14 Followers


bincryptofond pfp
bincryptofond
@bincrypto
Почему я не елигбл(
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

bincryptofond pfp
bincryptofond
@bincrypto
А ті получил токен МоН?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

bincryptofond pfp
bincryptofond
@bincrypto
sol150
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

bincryptofond pfp
bincryptofond
@bincrypto
Gmm
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

bincryptofond pfp
bincryptofond
@bincrypto
Kilop
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

bincryptofond pfp
bincryptofond
@bincrypto
Farcaster badge
0 reply
1 recast
0 reaction

Ink pfp
Ink
@inkonchain
ink the future with @rainbow ✍️
9 replies
222 recasts
355 reactions

Ink pfp
Ink
@inkonchain
House of Ink @ ETH Denver 🏔️ Join us for a 5-day hacker house experience: • Workshops & tooling deep dives • Smart contract dev sessions • Mentorship from Ink team & ecosystem leaders • Networking with VCs & top builders Apply today 👉 https://lu.ma/kvj8l82q
21 replies
156 recasts
539 reactions

Ink pfp
Ink
@inkonchain
Grab a slice of data served by @growthepie 🥧 ⤵️
21 replies
112 recasts
452 reactions

Ink pfp
Ink
@inkonchain
We’re excited to announce Ink is live on mainnet! Months ahead of schedule, we’re officially launching as part of the Optimism Superchain. This is just the beginning of our journey to bridge the gap between users and builders in DeFi. Let’s ink the future together ✍️
59 replies
900 recasts
2110 reactions

Christian_Dtmr pfp
Christian_Dtmr
@evaluate
Some advice I keep hearing is to build things now that can only be done poorly with ai, but that could be made immediately 100x better by simply swapping in a future/more capable LLM underneath that meets the threshold your product needs to feel magical. Makes a ton of sense when you compare things like v0 today vs v0 on release.
5 replies
14 recasts
102 reactions

bincryptofond pfp
bincryptofond
@bincrypto
Hans Christian Andersen could not write almost a single word correctly.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

bincryptofond pfp
bincryptofond
@bincrypto
The first monograph devoted to "black humor" (Max Schultz. The literature of black humor of the sixties 3), which gives precisely the definition, that is, the establishment of clear limits to the applicability of this term, was published in 1973. The subtitle of this work is: - "A pluralistic definition of man and his world." The material for the study this time was the works of American writers of the sixties (John Barth, Kurt Vonnegut, Thomas Berger, Thomas Pynchon, Robert Coover, Bruce Friedman, Charles Wright) and the stories of H.L. Borges, who were just becoming famous in America at that time. Considering "black humor" to be one of the types of literature whose content is the absurd, Schultz points out its essential differences: it does not glorify human individuality, as existentialism did, and, unlike other types of literature of the absurd, it is devoid of a sense of despair and powerlessness.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction