Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/aichannel
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

base pfp
base
@basewtf
I’m currently rolling out a company official GPT to my company and I didn’t realize how big of a deal data privacy / legal is in deploying. What is your experience and what have you or your company done to address it if you’ve had this rolled out? Training, DLP, block everything?
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions

Colin Charles pfp
Colin Charles
@bytebot
Oh it’s a big deal. Training to ensure nothing secret goes out. This is in many ways the DLP. Don’t block everything. People find workarounds. But legal and compliance always take a big view of this. Convince them that it’s being used regardless. Depends on setup, Cisco can also log. We lack “proxies” today
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

base pfp
base
@basewtf
I have a good lockdown so I can block unofficial gpt’s and I will in the future. It seems right now it’s training over DLP as DLP can get expensive to implement. It’s def being used regardless so the key thing is to have them use it in the approved system.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Colin Charles pfp
Colin Charles
@bytebot
good lockdown to block unofficial gpts is good, but dont forget personal devices. as long as the approved system is good enough, people will use it. have a client who's migrating from google apps to microsoft365. gemini is better than copilot, they're paying for both, yet the office folk like to use chatgpt, and the devs are using vs code copilot (and would love to use cursor or claude code). full on windows shop, since it security can do device management
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction