Geopolitics

Someone I know posted this. Let me explain why this is a dumb take: 

Firstly, this rhetoric is emblematic of loss of historical and contextual awareness many young people have today. It’s false moral equivalence. It’s a shift from fact-based analysis to vibes-based justice. 

It comes from a place of instinctive “fairness” but ignores why rules and trust exist in geopolitics - because actors aren’t equal. It’s justice by symmetry not history. People want this clear victim vs. villian narrative. This simplification directly feeds extremism narratives. 

Israel has never officially admitted to having nukes, never signed the NPT, and hasn’t threatened other countries with nuclear annihilation. 

Iran did sign the NPT - but violated it by hiding parts of its program. More importantly, its regime regularly threatens to destroy Israel, funds terror groups like Hezbollah and Islamic Jihad, and chants “Death to America / Death to Israel” at state rallies.

That’s why the world doesn’t trust the Iranian regime with uranium. It’s not about fairness, it’s about intent.

⭐️ Product @ethereum

📊 prev founder @goldchain, ML Eng, fencer 🤺 | 🇮🇱🇺🇸
/marissa