Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/cryptosapiens
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Asha 🎩↑🔵
@asha
Are we the co-creators of LLMs? Every prompt, correction, and rephrase we make teaches the model something new. In this article @samchalom calls it invisible work, a "cognitive asset" we give away for free. And then raises the question... what if prompts were recognized (like songs or artworks), tracked, valued, and rewarded? Imagine micropayments for every contribution that made models smarter. A fairer redistribution of value. A shift from “user” to co-creator. Found this interesting, what's your take? https://paragraph.com/@ayastudio/what-if-we-were-paid-for-what-we-feed-ai
6 replies
8 recasts
9 reactions
AlleyTac
@alleytac
No micro payments received until now. But here's one for you 6 $EGGS
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Sashelka 🖤🩸
@sashelka
So they should be the ones paying me for gpt chat and not me paying them? 😱😅😅
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
samchalom .⌐◨-◨
@samchalom
Thank you for picking up my article 🙏 Curious to hear how others imagine this future of co-creation with AI
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
nomadicframe 🎩
@nomadicframe
Yes we’re co-creators. Every prompt makes AI smarter, but right now we give that value away for free, actually we end up paying for it. If prompts were treated like creative work and rewarded, it would turn us from “users” into true partners in building AI.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Nutscity13
@nutscity13
This hits so deep
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Milibooo 👻🎩
@milibooo
I like how it’s titled “ invisible work” ! You’re doing great bro 💞✨💞 1111 $REPLY
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
