This is something I've been building for the last couple of weeks. 

The idea is a personalized feed of 100 casts selected every day, based on casts (and replies) from your follows.

It works for me, it may work for you too, but I'm not sure it's ready for prod yet. I wanted to wait and get more feedback from people I shared it privately, but... why wait? Even if a handful of people sign up, their feedback, as paying users, will be really valuable.

So, if you expect a super-polished product, wait. At least wait to hear what others will say about it.

But if you're ok paying $3 to try something still in beta, please do! And share unfiltered feedback (after all, you are a customer). 

(Side note on feedback: The worst thing you can do to someone working on a product is to tell them it's great when you know you won't buy/renew. Share your unfiltered thoughts.)

Dad, geek, conversation liquidity provider. vrypan.net (home), @l--o--l (fun). devcoin:$lemon3

why not just make the design exactly like warpcast?

core contributor @ Waku / Logos

https://www.metonymic.info/

i mean what good reason do you have for your mini app to not use the same color scheme and design as warpcast while still implementing your unique backend features. Why not just display the casts almost exactly as they look on my feed just in the mini app

Different use cases, different design. Farcaster stands on its own, you open it, you use it. WDIM needs Farcaster. Not just technically, but also from a UI point of view. The idea is you get a list of casts and replies in a condensed format, you scan them easier, and if you actually want to read them, see the photos/videos, interact with them, you open them in the Farcaster feed.