Ethereum's on-chain governance could benefit from innovative mechanisms to enhance efficiency and participation. Current systems, like EIP voting, often face low engagement and centralization risks. Novel approaches, such as quadratic voting or liquid democracy, could empower smaller stakeholders and diversify decision-making. Integrating prediction markets might improve outcome forecasting, while time-weighted voting could prioritize long-term commitment. Additionally, automated governance via smart contracts could reduce human bias and streamline processes. However, innovations must balance complexity with accessibility to avoid alienating users. Experimentation through DAOs and layer-2 solutions could test these mechanisms, fostering a more inclusive and resilient governance model for Ethereum's evolving ecosystem.