If a dev made new coins every day they'd be called a rugger, scammer, PnD'er. 

But when it's a content creator, and their content just happens to be coins, it's not a big deal?

Ok.

Building /veil -- ZK Privacy Protocol for Base

Having this convo on twotterX & in the ZenAcademy disco right now.

Dif coins exist for diff reasons. Content coins aren’t project coins aren’t memecoins & if speculators ape on things without info or diligence they’re choosing to speculate as well

TLDR - we aren't there yet I guess with content coins.

People will trade them like project coins, but should expect multiple of them to appear all at once.

Stay Curious // iixii // Head of Crypto at https://www.lazertechnologies.com/  // Prev: CoinDesk, Roc Nation // based @basedevo

change takes time 

they’ll learn to not treat all coins the same

I agree, but people seem to trade them all the same though.

not all coins are the same 

and that’s the way we should treat them

I think one of the biggest mistakes made with "content coins" is that we knew they were coins in the first place.

Erc20s and uniswap lps are cool and have lots of benefits, but they don't always have to be obvious to the user

when devs launch a coin, people expect more (like utility and all), but when it’s a content creator, it’s just meme. just my opinion

I also think it’s based on promise. Dev’s tend to have white papers. Content is well, just content

Maybe the issue isn’t coins, it’s expectations. Content ≠ commitment.