Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Andy Jagoe pfp
Andy Jagoe
@andyjagoe
GDP/capita in the US would be $100-200k instead of $65k if we had stayed on the Adams curve we should be using more energy, not less
4 replies
0 recast
12 reactions

Andy Jagoe pfp
Andy Jagoe
@andyjagoe
there's no such thing as a rich country that consumes little energy
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

Giuliano Giacaglia ๐ŸŒฒ pfp
Giuliano Giacaglia ๐ŸŒฒ
@giu
We should ๐Ÿ’ฏ focus on making energy cheaper and producing more energy! From nuclear to coal. We should make more energy!
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Ed O'Shaughnessy pfp
Ed O'Shaughnessy
@eddieosh
Yes, and we have already hit peak oil production. There are as yet no viable alternatives (high density, high transportability) to hydrocarbons. The faster we burn the faster the "Seneca Cliff" approaches. This is a systemic problem but there seems no genuine effort to invest in real alternatives to hydrocarbons.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

lucas pfp
lucas
@elesel.eth
fr turn on the taps, give humanity energy
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions