Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/brypto
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

androidsixteen pfp
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
A young person in the dot com era had to build something or be part of an enterprise to benefit from the tech paradigm shift (generally speaking) A young person in the crypto era doesn't have to build anything, they can just bet correctly This decoupling of money & meaning is a competitive moat for those who prioritize meaning
11 replies
8 recasts
83 reactions

↑Dom pfp
↑Dom
@onchaindom.eth
I would add though that those populations are not the same. People who weren’t into software in the dot com era were on the sidelines. In crypto they come in to fill some of that speculative role that used to just be professional investors, which actually incentivizes the builders, who I think will build anyway.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

will pfp
will
@w
i wasn't around for it but i'm under the impression a lot of young people were betting on it via public markets (companies IPO'd very early back then, often with little to no traction)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

rubinovitz pfp
rubinovitz
@rubinovitz
Being able to bet your labor vs capital was more equalizing.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

wake pfp
wake
@wake
unpack “bet correctly” — for serial winners there’s a lot going on besides serendipity.
1 reply
0 recast
12 reactions

smarsx pfp
smarsx
@smarsx.eth
more young people traded dot com stocks than worked for a company that ipo’d. not as different as you’d think.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Zach pfp
Zach
@zherring
This is essentially cryptoFIRE.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Peter Kim pfp
Peter Kim
@peter
Great take
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

dycp pfp
dycp
@tn100x.eth
you may call it a decoupling. i call it living in the past. get with the times as a founder and cater to the edge. getting hit with the blunt side is just makin me more retarded.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

hunter pfp
hunter
@bfresh
10000% also helps in giving yourself purpose - one cannot live without that even if one is rich
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

sardius.eth pfp
sardius.eth
@sardius
good insight, meaning feels like a competitive advantage (although both can be)… makes the money a bit stickier when it’s tied to something one defines as real
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nafisat pfp
Nafisat
@nafeeesah
That split makes meaning the edge for those still chasing it
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction