From reading the users casts the past 24 hours about the @DAU launch is:

1. Clanker has more volatility, but it’s more susceptible to snipes. (There is crazy tech for this, ik people that have demon setups) Even with the anti snipe mechanisms in place it is no where near the fairest of launches. A lot of supply can get into bad hands.

2. Farstore launches have 1:1 liq ratio and there isn’t much volatility. It does protect the users that funded the initial raise though. Since the people who funded are protected from significant downside they don’t have to be scared of selling their tokens and can stake/use their them. Tipn for example has over 40% of the supply staked.

In all honesty, what’s not to like about @farstore launches?

The main problem of @farstore is its huge liquidity. 
Using $Tipn as an example, we saw how hard it is for such coins to go up. 
The possible low upside also repels potential buyers. 
Farstore has no time limits for the presale, and the maximum presale size of 100 ETH is a strong minus for presale projects.

I created a voluntary channel to fight scammers on Farcaster. Co-founder:
/rug-control

https://app.interface.social/0x591c33299a98472a91f2dc2877d91a1bc2b1f9a5

It definitely doesn't look attractive for volume traders for sure. Farstore's purpose is to mediate raising funds with protecting the projects downside. It allows for investors, believers and builders to work together. Without the fear/need to sell tokens because of potential downside. Short term bad / long term good

Otherwise the service is good. I think team will soon understand the main problems of the current implementation and make the service more convenient.