your mom's favorite farcaster (probably), building /quidli 🦑, casting in /justinahn, daoing in /🍊 & /🟪

hilariously case in point for me is this poor account being hidden in your replies 🤣

Be specific.    
Building productscore.org, @germanify // leonasskau.co.uk // Hosting /geopolitics, /strategy, /leo
d33m:mun

building /quidli 🦑, casting in /justinahn, daoing in /🍊 & /🟪

so what's the point in discriminating one way but then not discriminating when it comes to counting in total metrics and then taking funds?

fwiw, i'm ok if merkle decides to discriminate but then be explicit and consistent with it. not just when it suits them/a popular opinion.

As in, spam accounts should be banned from buying pro?

I see the logic there
I think MM were concerned about selling out

i mean, if you're effectively shutting them out anyways, i find it a bit odd to let them buy subscriptions when there would definitely be ample demand from other users

>I think MM were concerned about selling out

again, imo demand was high and i'm pretty sure dan/the team knew the frenzy they'd be whipping up with the 1000 NFTs statement

Last night, I began analyzing the Farcaster Pro data (basescan API + Neynar to retrieve user information using the wallet address). Found some interesting insights. I will write about a few, and attach the GitHub repos for anyone who wants to analyze them further. This is the data for the first 24h.

you can see the frenzy for the first 10k and then the drop off in interest soon after the NFT was gone

then anecdotally many euro based accounts have lamented missing out due to being asleep because they thought supply would be there when they woke up

you can see the frenzy for the first 10k and then the drop off in interest soon after the NFT was gone

then anecdotally many euro based accounts have lamented missing out due to being asleep because they thought supply would be there when they woke up
https://farcaster.xyz/mani/0x80f28ff9

Was their ample demand? How many have the badge?