Half a day into the not following anyone and observing something:

The feed is really good.
I’m seeing diverse and interesting content. 

But it doesn’t “feel” as good and that’s because I’m not seeing content from people I know intimately. 

It doesn’t have the group chat feels.

something something it’s not about the content, but the relationships we make?

Cohost of /gmfarcaster, a live stream Farcaster news show.  Engineer. Mom x 3.

yup, for sure. 

and also, seeing all my old friends with a "plus" icon on their pfp is so strange.  i didn't notice before how attuned i was to using that to filter who is close to me

Hacker founder using ai to coordinate onchain economies /tenfold, nounish channel client /comint

More: rubinovitz.com

Text content generates so much meaning from the speaker.
e.g. if Paul Graham tweets something people will take it much more seriously than some random kid.
If a friend tweets they're at a bagel store you're happy for them, if a random person is, you don't care.

I am currently following 2,311 accounts.
I am about to run a script to unfollow everyone.

I plan to refollow everyone in the next week or so.  

Why am I doing this?
> I am in a tinkering mood and wanted to play around with programmable social

Just felt like playing around with programmable social and APIs :)

j-hn.info | /beings-club | spiritual friendship + creativity

Just felt like playing around with programmable social and APIs :)

https://farcaster.xyz/adrienne/0x3ed6374b

Out of curiosity, why did you unfollow everyone? 

(I've also done it and am up to following about 30 now since I broke the seal)

first large-scale study measuring how much real monetary value people place on their social media networks was just published by MIT / Carnegie Mellon researchers.

asked 20k U.S. adults how much they'd have to be paid to give up Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, or X* or to use them without specific features for 1 month.

on average, users value them at $80 - $100/month. some interesting takeaways below:

1. direct connections ("local" network effects) drive 20 - 34% of platform value.

2. on FB and insta, strong ties (family, close friends) matter most. on LinkedIn and X, weaker ties (professional, acquaintances) are more valuable.

3. men value social network connections to women more than to men; women value connections to men and women equally.

4. features that boost active creation (posting, stories, reels) drive more platform value than just consuming.

5. low-income users derive more incremental value from FB Messenger (cheaper than paying for SMS or cell), FB and LinkedIn groups (helps with community, local buy/sell, economic mobility), and X Lists (relevant news or niche communities). 

only issue is that all respondents were 18+ and the average age of this study was... 44 years old. Gen Alpha and young Gen Z always drive the next wave of culture and consumer trends.

*would be interesting to do this study with 16 - 21 year olds and include TikTok and Snapchat. we don't know if they value creation tools, ephemeral content, and algos more or less than Millennial adults.

full study here: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.04545

at least a third of platform value is often derived from direct connections (at least for instagram, Facebook, twitter and LinkedIn)

at least a third of platform value is often derived from direct connections (at least for instagram, Facebook, twitter and LinkedIn)

https://farcaster.xyz/ted/0xc5921b2f