Content
@
https://onchainsummer.xyz
0 reply
26 recasts
26 reactions
Project7
@project7
I genuinely believe the parent-child token model is the future of @base.base.eth — it enables healthier token ecosystems by building token families from existing assets. Just look at the relationship between $HUNT and $MT. $MT is a child token of $HUNT, backed by a bonding curve with $HUNT in its LP. So when $HUNT’s price rises, $MT’s price naturally benefits — like we saw today. By using a strong existing token as the parent and launching child tokens or NFTs on top, the entire token family grows together. Isn’t this a far better model than the short-term pump dot fun meme coin chaos? https://mint.club/token/base/MT
15 replies
8 recasts
26 reactions
Dmitrii
@3lirzzrgo0
the idea is genuinely good, but I still can't fully grasp—what's the point of these child tokens? we already have ETH, BTC, SOL, and so on... Why do they need child tokens? Why keep multiplying them?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Dmitrii
@3lirzzrgo0
Meanwhile, I even created my own child tokens—PEPE, HUNT PEPE—but honestly, I still don’t get why I did that lol.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Project7
@project7
The fact: people always want "coining", right? Like pump dot fun, claker, zora, ... these are all about that. Our approach: why don't you "coining" from existing tokens you love rather than a scratch? So, the child tokens/NFTs on Mint Club are rooted on some parent tokens and their valuations are chained by bonding curve, meaning that parent pumped -> child pumped && child pumped -> more parent tokens required on its bonding curve -> parent's valuation can be increased too. 1777 👏
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
