Name pfp

Name

@2h

285 Following
179 Followers
Name pfp
Name
@2h
i will activate my wall by clicking this button šŸ‘‡šŸ¼, and you can write on it by doing the same or even get yours, if you think that's a good idea hurry up, there are less than before left
0 reply
0 recast
10 reactions
catra ā†‘ pfp
catra ā†‘
@catra.eth
120+ hb creation submitted insane work by @bbroad @stustustudio @tomkey @asha @agrimony.eth @madlog1c.eth @hll @nuconomy.eth @2h and others missed the submission? drop your hbs in drive/dropbox and dm me the link, iā€™ll add them to the canvas. to all og hb holders: votingā€™s coming. stay sharp, more soon hb
9 replies
8 recasts
32 reactions
Name pfp
Name
@2h
Hired a new trader for Coin Collective on @dxrgai terminal. Would be great to have something like this for real tokens, itā€™s going to be fun.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Name pfp
Name
@2h
This is great, more awareness around crypto art is needed. Crypto art is still not understood by most people, and serious academic reflection is also lacking. People will be amazed when they realize it is more than just a tool for speculation; it is a genuine artistic language of the digital era.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Name pfp
Name
@2h
For comments, we could implement content sorting options: showing popular, early, or most recent posts first. This would help bring some order to the chaos. Regarding ā€œspamā€ labels, they should only be applied in the most obvious and extreme cases - such as when a user is sharing malicious links or engaging in blatant spam distribution. This can be easily identified. The ultimate goal is to provide equal rights to as many users as possible: those who are just beginning to interact with the platform, those who are in read-only mode, those who havenā€™t decided on their content yet, or those who simply donā€™t know how to post well. This way, they wonā€™t be isolated and will continue to participate on equal terms with others, receive airdrops, be heard, and so on.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Name pfp
Name
@2h
Levels 1, 2, and 3 will be treated the same within Warpcast. These users will be visible in followers, will receive airdrops, and their comments wonā€™t be hidden. However, users should be given the option to sort and choose whether they want to see content from all categories or just 1, 2, etc. By default, users will see everything except activity from level 4 spammers. For channels, we can combine this with the ability for admins to not only ban/exclude users but also to reduce their access specifically for that channel. We could also allow all channel participants to reduce the visibility of a userā€™s posts via a conditional "dislike." If the user receives too many dislikes from different people, their posts will only be visible to their friends. This isnā€™t a ban or exclusion, but a targeted weakening of the account within that particular channel. In any case, a large channel without moderation is doomed.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Name pfp
Name
@2h
Itā€™s a very complex task, and perhaps itā€™s worth approaching the problem from a different angle. What is the core issue? Users who are not engaging in harmful activity may receive ā€œspamā€ labels. But why is this bad for them? Their comments get hidden, they donā€™t receive tokens, they donā€™t count toward metrics, and so on. But is it possible to ensure that they donā€™t face these consequences? I think we need to define which accounts are not causing any obvious harm and simply not apply these restrictions to them. Here are a few ideas. We could implement a system with 4 levels, named as follows: 1. Content Creator/Influencer 2. User 3. Suspicious User (low activity, no verifications) 4. Spammer (clearly harmful)
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Name pfp
Name
@2h
ye, higher level ā†‘
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Name pfp
Name
@2h
HB ATHLETICS @catra.eth
2 replies
0 recast
8 reactions
Name pfp
Name
@2h
Is this going to be a game or what?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Name pfp
Name
@2h
I'd define spam as repeated or irrelevant content distributed with the intent to manipulate visibility, algorithms, or user behavior. I get that setting this up is complex, but right now the system feels too strict and too blind. If you just be yourself (even if you're a boring, careless person reposting project deals, discounts, etc), you can easily get flagged. But if you figure out the right frequency and style, you'll be fine. Iā€™d like the "spam" label to be a last resort, with many factors considered before itā€™s applied - especially if the account is linked to other social networks, a phone number, and 3 wallets, lol.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Name pfp
Name
@2h
I'm not an expert in this, but it's just common sense. If someone has passed 6 out of 6 verifications and isn't engaging in spam in any way, they shouldn't be marked as a spammer. If this is a necessity, then introduce parallel metrics, for example, mark accounts with low activity separately, and have a distinct category for spammers, who are clearly spammers, not something ambiguous.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Name pfp
Name
@2h
Absolutely, it's the role that matters, not the individuality.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Name pfp
Name
@2h
Oh, thatā€™s a Warpcast-specific problem, the labeling system is absurdly poorly configured, but I guess they just had more pressing things to deal with. Sooner or later, theyā€™ll probably get around to improving it.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Name pfp
Name
@2h
Itā€™s possible to some extent, but hardly worth the effort, itā€™s better to shift the focus to intentions, consequences, and value.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Eclectic Method pfp
Eclectic Method
@eclecticmethod
The Future Past
2 replies
1 recast
10 reactions
Name pfp
Name
@2h
That vibe grabbed me
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Name pfp
Name
@2h
I just created Whiskerlight using @titles. Mint:
0 reply
0 recast
10 reactions
Name pfp
Name
@2h
Come pet a cat or dog! Don't get bitten though! Play Pet Me by @towerecosystem @jastra
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Name pfp
Name
@2h
OK COMPUTER by @dailofrog x @bankr
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction