Name pfp

Name

@2h

293 Following
181 Followers
Name pfp
Name
@2h
Yeah, but I mean the strategy isn't to bring the token into Telegram, but to lead Telegram toward the token, that is, into Farcaster.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Name pfp
Name
@2h
try bankr
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Name pfp
Name
@2h
Expansion is necessary, but you're underestimating Farcaster. While 99% of meme tokens come from Web2, $higher was born natively in Web3 within a decentralized protocol. It’s still too soon for most to see it, but over time that will change.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Name pfp
Name
@2h
Ratifying @procoin governance
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Live! https://tbpn.vercel.app/
23 replies
79 recasts
436 reactions
Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
lfg 5,000!
88 replies
177 recasts
1059 reactions
Name pfp
Name
@2h
YEEEE 🤘
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Name pfp
Name
@2h
pro 😎
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Name pfp
Name
@2h
Is it possible to make options for a web wallet, how long to stay logged in? I would like more than 7 days.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Name pfp
Name
@2h
i will activate my wall by clicking this button 👇🏼, and you can write on it by doing the same or even get yours, if you think that's a good idea hurry up, there are less than before left
0 reply
0 recast
10 reactions
catra ↑ pfp
catra ↑
@catra
120+ hb creation submitted insane work by @bbroad @stustustudio @tomkey @asha @agrimony.eth @madlog1c.eth @hll @nuconomy.eth @2h and others missed the submission? drop your hbs in drive/dropbox and dm me the link, i’ll add them to the canvas. to all og hb holders: voting’s coming. stay sharp, more soon hb
10 replies
7 recasts
29 reactions
Name pfp
Name
@2h
Hired a new trader for Coin Collective on @dxrgai terminal. Would be great to have something like this for real tokens, it’s going to be fun.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Name pfp
Name
@2h
This is great, more awareness around crypto art is needed. Crypto art is still not understood by most people, and serious academic reflection is also lacking. People will be amazed when they realize it is more than just a tool for speculation; it is a genuine artistic language of the digital era.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Name pfp
Name
@2h
For comments, we could implement content sorting options: showing popular, early, or most recent posts first. This would help bring some order to the chaos. Regarding “spam” labels, they should only be applied in the most obvious and extreme cases - such as when a user is sharing malicious links or engaging in blatant spam distribution. This can be easily identified. The ultimate goal is to provide equal rights to as many users as possible: those who are just beginning to interact with the platform, those who are in read-only mode, those who haven’t decided on their content yet, or those who simply don’t know how to post well. This way, they won’t be isolated and will continue to participate on equal terms with others, receive airdrops, be heard, and so on.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Name pfp
Name
@2h
Levels 1, 2, and 3 will be treated the same within Warpcast. These users will be visible in followers, will receive airdrops, and their comments won’t be hidden. However, users should be given the option to sort and choose whether they want to see content from all categories or just 1, 2, etc. By default, users will see everything except activity from level 4 spammers. For channels, we can combine this with the ability for admins to not only ban/exclude users but also to reduce their access specifically for that channel. We could also allow all channel participants to reduce the visibility of a user’s posts via a conditional "dislike." If the user receives too many dislikes from different people, their posts will only be visible to their friends. This isn’t a ban or exclusion, but a targeted weakening of the account within that particular channel. In any case, a large channel without moderation is doomed.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Name pfp
Name
@2h
It’s a very complex task, and perhaps it’s worth approaching the problem from a different angle. What is the core issue? Users who are not engaging in harmful activity may receive “spam” labels. But why is this bad for them? Their comments get hidden, they don’t receive tokens, they don’t count toward metrics, and so on. But is it possible to ensure that they don’t face these consequences? I think we need to define which accounts are not causing any obvious harm and simply not apply these restrictions to them. Here are a few ideas. We could implement a system with 4 levels, named as follows: 1. Content Creator/Influencer 2. User 3. Suspicious User (low activity, no verifications) 4. Spammer (clearly harmful)
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Name pfp
Name
@2h
ye, higher level ↑
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Name pfp
Name
@2h
HB ATHLETICS @catra
2 replies
0 recast
8 reactions
Name pfp
Name
@2h
Is this going to be a game or what?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Name pfp
Name
@2h
I'd define spam as repeated or irrelevant content distributed with the intent to manipulate visibility, algorithms, or user behavior. I get that setting this up is complex, but right now the system feels too strict and too blind. If you just be yourself (even if you're a boring, careless person reposting project deals, discounts, etc), you can easily get flagged. But if you figure out the right frequency and style, you'll be fine. I’d like the "spam" label to be a last resort, with many factors considered before it’s applied - especially if the account is linked to other social networks, a phone number, and 3 wallets, lol.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction