jw 🦺 ERC6551 (0xjw.eth)

thanks @ted! https://per.ma/photo/0xE2fcf827B04A1C0E351363019576a3457a4755FE-403?ref=0x56ADc5BeCc8686164Ddfb4d200f9975403928189

• 1 reply
• 10 recasts
• 42 reactions

Is anyone working on zk-based consensus? Intuitively it seems like you could replace zk-unfriendly signatures in consensus algorithms with (recursive) proofs of pubkey = hash(privatekey, data) using a zk-friendly hash, which would enable much cheaper / faster proofs.

• 1 reply
• 1 recast
• 3 reactions

Definitely one of the top use cases

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 1 reaction

Would love to meet other protocol developers on Farcaster. Who should I talk to?

• 1 reply
• 0 recasts
• 0 reactions